Wednesday, October 6, 2010

covey

These past couple of weeks I’ve had biology on my mind. We had our first biology test recently, so I’ve been studying the functioning of many biological processes in our ecosystem(s). Covey’s claim about how we must relate to the interdependent “world every day” whether we like it or not seems to be in line with the thesis advanced by many biodiversity theorists in biology (51). This is a more significant conclusion than it appears. Covey borders on a hippie’s pipe dream when he describes us as being in “harmony with the natural laws of growth” (52). The fact that this thesis actually has scientific grounding suggests that Covey might actually be onto something. And this is not merely the perception of conservationists in the field. Even Major David Diner warns in the 1994 edition of the Military Law Review that “humans have artificially simplified may ecosystems” (Diner). “Theoretically, each new animal or plant extinction, with all its dimly perceived and intertwined affects, could cause total ecosystem collapse and human extinction. Each new extinction increases the risk of disaster. Like a mechanic removing, one by one, the rivets from an aircraft’s wings, n80 [hu]mankind may be edging closer to the abyss” (Diner). Even the academics associated with the military, despite their occasionally narrow focus, posit that interdependence may be an integral aspect of the human condition.

edging closer to the abyss


Another fascinating passage that I found in the Covey readings related to language. Covey indicts “reactive language” as becoming a “self-fulfilling prophecy” (79). Reactive language causes people to become reinforced in “the paradigm that they are determined, and they produce evidence to support the belief” (79). Although Covey is obviously discussing these issues in the context of self-help, I can’t help but connect this thought to a conversation that I coincidentally had in Bump’s office today. When I walked in for office hours, Sonali was actually describing the scope of her Project 2 essay and her passions in the area of feminism. One thing that she considered writing about was gendered language and how the male/female binary entrenched within language reproduces gender norms in society (I hope I’m not in trouble for the spoilers on her paper). Although a slightly different but still intimately related thought, many of the writings in Judith Butler’s famed book Gender Trouble also reflect a focus on language. Butler’s primarily concerned with the focus on a static category of “women” that characterizes feminist politics in the 21st century. She calls for an investigation of our presuppositions about representations and understandings of women in order to avoid silencing any voices that might not directly align with traditional understandings of females. Both Sonali and Butler seem to support Covey’s argument that we could fall into dangerous traps because of the language that we use. Covey’s application of these theoretical thoughts to our approach to everyday life (and love, in the example he gives) seem to be relevant. Taking proactive control of one’s language can provide new paths to emancipation previously thought to be impossible.

personal constitution


I did find some of Covey’s advice problematic. Covey advocates the development of a “personal mission statement” similar to a “personal constitution” (107). He proceeds to develop an extended analogy by noting that the United States Constitution has remained “fundamentally changeless” since the creation of the country (107). Covey believes that such a personal statement can be the “basis for making major, life-directing decisions” and can empower “individuals with the same timeless strength in the midst of change” (108). After all, “people can’t live with change if there’s not a changeless core inside them” (108). While Covey’s archaic representation of power remains “under the spell of monarch” and clings to images of power-law traced out by “theoreticians of right and the monarchic institution,” I actually think it’s more important to object to Covey on a personal level (Foucault). From my own personal experiences, I’ve found that the most radical changes to my personal views on life have been the most beneficial. Indeed, if I had developed a personal constitution just a year ago, it would be radically different from the ‘constitution’ that I live my life by now. I instead think it’s more useful to have your own personal roadmap in life constantly in flux. It seems that any change is going to merely be reformist unless one is willing to genuinely allow radical thoughts change their core. I also don’t think having a grounding in a world view prevents the implementation of Covey’s other recommendations. Nevertheless, Covey offers great insight for the most part, and I look forward to discussing this book with the class tomorrow.




Works Cited

David N. Diner. Major and Judge Advocate in the General’s Corps. “The Army and the Endangered Species Act: Who’s Endangering Whom?” 143 Mil. L. Rev. 161. Winter 1994. Lexis.


Michel Foucault. The History of Sexuality: Volume 1. 1978. pp. 88-91

Monday, October 4, 2010

pedgagoy cont'd

This liberal arts education can have great potential to change society. Education is seen as an attempt to foster cooperation within society. As a result of this paradigm shift, the civilized life of the university is no longer lived "alone but in concert" (293). Creative thought and innovative developments, previously considered to be the halmark of profit-motive driven forms of education (the benefits of Microsoft's profit margins for us all) are instead rejected in favor of creative thought that benefits society (the developments of open source Linux software, as a counter-example).

pedagogy and the public sphere

Education is in a crisis. Professor of Media at McMaster University Henry Grioux argues in his 2008 article entitled “The Militarization of US Higher Education after 9/11” that neoliberalism has caused education to increasingly focus upon producing productive members for the global workforce while uniquely foreclosing the opportunity to view education as an end in itself. The influence of neoliberalism upon higher education has distorted the focus of curriculum to be oriented towards profit motives instead of towards the genuine appreciation of knowledge or the empowering of society as a whole. The only solution to this problem is to “reclaim higher education as a democratic public sphere, one that provides the pedagogical conditions for students to become critical agents who connect learning to expanding and deepening the struggle for genuine democratization” (Giroux). I personally feel like much of the literature in the assigned reading this past few weekend is focused on a vision of liberal arts education that can achieve many of the goals articulated by Henry Giroux.

Henry Giroux at his finest



A passage in the anthology notes that the purpose of experiential learning is to “make the value of education more obvious because you begin connecting information to the “real world.”” (45). It inherently connects the value of education towards real life struggles that are occurring in the status quo instead of future job opportunities that might improve the country’s GDP. Experiential learning is inherently more organic, and I feel like it translates to more direct benefits to society. This goal for thought is a process that tries to move “an individual to membership in a community; so a thought, begun in the seminary of a single mind, participates in the construction of a citadel of living ideas, of a life organic and yet shaped” (293). This is clearly the purpose of a liberal arts education. Similar to lots of the focus on animals and ethics that we have in Bump’s class, we are trying to connect our thinking with broader notions of empathy and acknowledgement of the material struggle of others. Liberal arts education fundamentally changes the paradigm of thought so that it is oriented towards more ethical goals instead of merely self-interest.




we don't want education to be focused on this

One other problem that I feel like exists with many normal modes of education is what I like to call “thinking in islands” instead of holistically. The separation of different modes of thought into different classes and departments makes it seem like knowledge exists in isolated spheres. However, knowledge is simply the attempt to discover and describe the world. all forms of knowledge inherently compliment each other. Interdisciplinary forms of knowledge function to “unsettle the boundary lines between science and science, to disturb their action, to destroy the harmony which binds them together. Such a proceeding will have a corresponding effect when introduced into a place of education. There is no science but tells a different tale, when viewed as a portion of a whole, from what it is likely to suggest when taken by itself, without the safeguard, as I may call it, of others” (288).  Rather than understanding instances of physics or biology as separate, all of these modes of thought are very intimately related with each other. I feel like the interdisciplinary focus of Plan II and of liberal arts education in general provides a more holistic, and thereby more accurate, world view. The quest for knowledge is situated in a more ethical manner this way.



Henry Giroux. 2008. “The Militarization of US Higher Education after 9/11”. Theory, Culture & Society. Pages 58-59.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Alice in Austin

My arrival at UT has functioned as somewhat of a rebirth to me. Whether this is an authentic emotion or partially influenced by Bump’s constant references to a feeling of rebirth, this has still been something bery important to me. College is an opportunity to redefine yourself and shut the doors on the skeletons in your closet. In some ways, I am able to view myself as a child ready to grow up once again. I could probably even tie this perception to a few influential religious beliefs that I have encountered in my life. Having been raised Lutheran, I subscribed to the belief that you are reborn everyday for your sins. Rather than being forced to be perpetually stigmatized for your decisions, I am able to repent and take my life in a new direction. Despite having liked this principle of the religion, I still eventually grew to have many disagreements. It was at this time that I was exposed to many continental philosophers who pointed to new paths in ethics that are not inspired by one sole religious belief. But nevertheless, I believe that as my extremely ethical views progress I will always have the ability to ‘reset’ and begin my life anew.

thoughts floating in my brain




In this same token, college provides a unique opportunity to do this. While this type of rebirth may be positive, it sometimes feels like there is a dark underside to my existence. This is somewhat reminiscent of Alice, who at her core there “also lies a tale of angst and the darker aspects of the story have often been commented on” (198). Even Professor of English at Ryukoku University John Dougill notes that “in the progress for Wonderland the young rectory boy/girl exhibits all of the culture shocks of a freshman transposed from home and dropped into college life.” (199). Because of this, I have always found it fascinating that Lewis Carroll strives for portraying the innocence of childhood while also incorporating darker elements into the story. It’s almost as if he’s trying to emphasize that no pure birth can ever occur. As a result, I can’t help but be wary about my experiences that I will face.

rebirth

Monday, September 20, 2010

The Praying Mantis: Power in Patience

Carl Fitz
World Lit – Bump
September 20, 2010
The Praying Mantis: Power in Patience
    In an ancient Egyptian passage hailing the mystical powers of the praying mantis, the author addresses the mantis, “Stable art thou, O mighty god, for even, Make thou for me a path upon which I may pursue my course” (Prete and Wolfe 97). The praying mantis has existed as a totem animal for cultures throughout the history of humanity, including ancient Egyptian, Chinese, and Indian societies. Although their depictions of the praying mantis sometimes vary, prevalent themes of the animal’s power include its patience and wisdom. As I have meditated about my relationship with the praying mantis in recent weeks, I have found that both of the aforementioned traits have played and continue to play integral roles in my life. Channeling the energy of the praying mantis allows me to unlock patience, wisdom, and power in my life.


    The praying mantis has held meaning for many humans over the course of history. One understanding of the praying mantis that I have found particularly compelling is the Kalahari Bushmens’ conception of the praying mantis. Animal educator Ted Andrews writes in his 1993 book Animal-Speak that “to the Kalihari Bushmen of Africa, Mantis was a Bushmen,” and “whenever Mantis got himself into trouble, he would go off and hide. He would then go to sleep and dream a solution to his problem” (Andrews 343). Although the praying mantis is physically smaller than humans, the Kalahari Bushmen still found them to be powerful in their own unique manner. This power was considered significant enough for groups of Bushmen to personally identify with the animal. The praying mantis offered the Kalahari Bushmen a specific roadmap for how to confront their problems. Rather than rush into action, it was believed that meditation and reflection allowed better solutions to problems to reveal themselves. This seems to imply that the power of thought can at times be more powerful than brute force. Such a conclusion is intimately related to the mantis’s being, considering the very word mantis is derived from a Greek word meaning prophet (Andrews 343). Upon the arrival of this conclusion, makes sense that many Kalahari Bushmen personally identified with the praying mantis despite its tiny stature. Rather than being oriented towards the stature of the animal, the Bushmen observed the mantis’s behavior and became more powerful because of it.

    The Kalahari Bushmen also admired the silence of the praying mantis. I found this particularly striking considering I generally associate the ability to speak one’s mind with empowerment. Only though communication and persuasion does one have the ability to affect their surroundings. However, the Bushmen seem to use the praying mantis to provide a competing counter-narrative to this claim. In their view, the “ancient mystics spoke of seven levels of silence that can be used by us, the first being simple contemplation and the last being death. In between them are dimensions that can add tremendous power to our life. This is part of what the praying mantis teaches. It teaches how to still the outer, so that when it is time to act (in any form) it is done with surety, accuracy, and great power” (Andrews 343). For the Bushmen, empowerment comes through patience instead of action. While action is by no mean forbidden, it is to be taken with great consideration. By doing so, the infrequent actions taken are inspired by wisdom and confidence rather than folly. Silence is thereby conducive to informed actions. While speaking may be empowering, perhaps it is only through silence that the utterances of words can derive importance. The Bushmen’s counter-narrative about the praying mantis seems to convey the importance of patience in one’s life. This patience even functions to sustain the praying mantis’s existence. Observations of the praying mantis’s eating practices reveal that the mantis will “wait motionless, blending into its surroundings, then at the most opportune time, it will suddenly grasp its prey in its long forelegs which fold over its victim like closing a jackknife upon it” (344). For the praying mantis, patience is not merely a conscious choice. Rather, the mantis is physically designed to sustain itself through patience. While its long forelegs might not be the fastest method used to kill its prey, it is extremely effective when combined with the mantis’s camouflage and the element of surprise. In order to exist, the praying mantis must constantly exert patience even in its most starved state. Clearly the praying mantis can be read as exemplifying the value of patience.

    While the Kalahari Bushmen understand the praying mantis as a largely tranquil animal, this is vastly different from the praying mantis depicted in ancient Chinese culture. In ancient China, the praying mantis represented “strength, courage, and boldness” (Prete and Wolfe 95). An ancient Chinese folktale even states that the praying mantis was crushed by the weight of a bullock cart despite having no chance to stop the runaway cart (95). In this folktale, the praying mantis is portrayed as being so confident of his or her strength that he or she is killed as a result. Needless to say, this is in stark contrast with the Kalahari Bushmen’s praying mantis. This information could prove to be extremely problematic for any individual seeking to learn from the praying mantis as a totem animal. The advancing of seemingly contradictory views of the praying mantis could lead one to conclude that one society must simply be mistaken. However, further meditation and personal inquiry has led me to resolve this conundrum differently. The rest of this paper will be devoted to my attempt to explore the praying mantis’s power in response to this complication.
    I have found the multiplicity of perspectives on the praying mantis to make the insect an even more appealing totem animal that previously thought. This is primarily because I can personally relate to having conflicting priorities about one’s internal growth. Both of my parents were raised as traditional Lutherans who were soft-spoken and polite. The most lucid example of this that comes to mind is my uncle’s observation about my father that he doesn’t talk much, but when he does he has something important to say. While they obviously never look down upon people who talk freely, they simply personally choose to live their life a certain way. As a result, I was inclined to behave this way at a young age. This trajectory took a distinctly different course upon my joining of speech and debate. At its very core, the activity moralizes verbal expression to a dizzying degree. Bringing me out of my shell, I became comfortable speaking my mind regardless of whether or not they might offend those around me. Sensitive to injustice in my surroundings, I found myself picking fights with teachers and administrators on a regular basis. After all, nothing wreaks of fascism more than a public high school. Although this sense of empowerment is ultimately a good thing, it can still result in a feeling of alienation at times. Perceived docility of those around me and increased hostility towards my parents caused me to feel uprooted from social interactions that I was previous grounded in. This internal conflict is extremely analogical to the conflict previously articulated about different social understandings of the praying mantis. While the praying mantis is at times depicted as being courageous and boastful, it is also understood as being a wise and patient creature. This type of thinking is also not out of line with traditional understandings of totemism. Even Ted Andrews argues that the spirit may be “of a being who uses the animal image to communicate messages of the world to humans” (Andrews 10). These similarities have led me to resolve to look to the praying mantis for solutions to these problems.
    Ultimately garnering the power of the praying mantis allows me to strike a balance between these conflicting influences upon my life. My admiration for the radical and unapologetic politics depicted in debate is just as strong as my admiration for my father as the wisest figure that I have met in my life. Coping with the development of subjectivities through a multiplicity of forces is hardly unique to me. Every individual is forced to find their place in response to a constant proliferation of contradictory world views and opinions. It is only through the power of the praying mantis that I understand that strength is important but dangerous. While the boastful mantis is crushed by a runaway cart, the cautiously powerful mantis successfully strikes its prey to live another day. While the overly timid mantis never catches its prey, the reflective mantis’s actions are influenced by its wisdom. By attempting to understand this power of balance and wisdom, I have been able to meditate on my own search for a balance between the influences of debate and of my parents.
    Clearly the praying mantis seems to be a fitting totem animal for my life. Not only does my attempt to seek the power of the praying mantis allow me to feel more connected with the energy of the animal itself, but it also opens up a new world of exploration into various cultures, political beliefs, and even teachings of my parents. As my life progresses, it is unclear what the praying mantis will teach me and whether or not I will eventually be chosen by another animal. Nevertheless, all signs seem to point to the relevancy of the praying mantis in my present life. I am only left to await the lessons that the praying mantis will teach as the year progresses.

Works Cited

Andrews, Ted. Animal Speak: The Spiritual & Magical Powers of Creatures Great & Small (2009): 10, 342-3.

Frederick Prete and Melissa Wolfe. “Religious supplicant, seductive cannibal, or reflex machine?     In search of the praying mantis”. Journal of the History of Biology. 1992: 95-7.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

suicidal thoughts

 "I wonder if I died, would tears come to her eyes?/Forgive me for my disrespect, forgive me for my lies" - Notorious B.I.G. ("Suicidal Thoughts")

Reports about suicide prevention will always have a very personal impact upon me. Two years ago, a close friend of mine committed suicide after battling drug and psychological problems for several months. Rather than being abstract studies about suicide, the reports in the anthology about suicide are automatically contextualized in my mind with this incident. Rather than being a spontaneous act of violence, I learned firsthand that “the vast majority of suicidal people communicate their intention to kill themselves by showing warning signs” (154). In my incident, the victim even explicitly told others about his intention to commit suicide. However, sufficient actions were not taken to prevent the tragedy.

Until recently, I felt relatively alone about my experience. While everyone else in my graduating class certainly understands my experience firsthand, it has been easy for me to think that others that I have subsequently encountered in recent years have not faced similar tragedies. However, the discussion that I had with Professor Bump and many of my classmates at dinner before the Plan II convocation altered this perception. Many of us discussed people that we had known that either committed suicide or seriously considered it. It seems that the problems of depression and suicide are stigmatized, with blame being displaced upon the victim. Although depression can sometimes be the result of one’s choices, uncontrollable psychological elements and other external tragedies are also frequently to blame. The voices of those suffering are pushed to the periphery, and I’m left to wonder how many suicides could be prevented if everyone was able to have as candid of a discussion about the topic as occurred at dinner that evening.




although this poster was originally used for HIV/AIDS, these campaigns should expand to psychological disorders, as well



On a lighter note, I found the parable of the South Indian Monkey Trap to be quite engaging and persuasive. Using a hollowed-out coconut, villagers placed “rice inside which can be seen through a small hole” that is “just big enough so that the monkey can put his hand in, but too small for his fist to come out after he has grabbed the rice” (167). Most fascinating about this parable is that it seems to suggest that ambition is an extremely common trait in biological entities. Not merely relegated to humans, this trap proves that monkeys can be just as overly ambitious as humans tend to be. Although this trait isn’t inherently bad, the preceding analysis presented in blog posts indicates that it’s extremely dangerous. Such ambition could be a source of anxiety and depression.

lol monkeys